• CONFERENCE
    • Welcome
    • Objectives
    • The IFE Conference Experience
    • Committee
    • Code of Ethics
    • IFE Conference Talks
    • News
    • Past Conferences
    • FAQ
  • Registration
    • On-site experience registration
    • Online experience registration
  • Call for papers
    • Objectives and Important Dates
    • Thematic Lines and Sub-themes
    • Types of Contribution
    • Submission Policy
      • Assignment of Authors’ Rights
      • License for Use of Contents
      • Inclusivity
      • Data Privacy
      • Open Access
    • Editorial & Academic Evaluation
      • Editorial Evaluation
      • Academic Review Process
      • Evaluation Time
      • Selection of Reviewers
      • Ethics in Peer Review
    • IFE Conference Author Center
      • ETHICS FOR AUTHORS
        • Responsibility of Co-authorship
        • Contributions of Authors
        • Modification of Co-authorship
        • Name Change
        • Scientific Fraud and Plagiarism
        • Experiment with Humans
        • Simultaneous or redundant publication
      • Writing the sections of the contribution
      • Use of Persistent Identifiers
  • Submit your paper
  • Proceedings & Certificates
    • Proceedings
    • Certificates
  • Sponsors 2024
  • Contact
  • ES
  • EN

Scientific Committee

The main objective of the CIIE’s Scientific Committee is to attract interesting and high-quality contributions to the event by carrying out the following processes:

  • Open Call for papers. The Scientific Committee develops the call for contributions along with the Conference’s Organizing Committee.
  • Group of evaluators. The Scientific Committee, with the support of the Group of Research and Innovation in Education, will make the call and select the experts who will participate as voluntary evaluators of the contributions submitted. These experts, from different institutions and countries, have a postgraduate degree, as well as extensive experience in education and innovation.
  • Evaluation. Each paper received will have three evaluations; there must be two evaluations with an acceptable result to move on to the next phase. The papers with an average score greater than 43 will be selected to be presented during the Conference (50 being the higher rating).
If you want to know the technical program committee click here.